1
zictos 2023-04-12 02:05:45 +08:00 via Android
不太行,很多新商品 chatgpt 其实是没规格参数的,或者参数是错的,除非你有每个型号的详细规格参数发给它比较。现在电商页面描述都是图片,又不太好复制
|
3
wfhtqp 2023-04-12 08:43:50 +08:00
要提前告诉它参数,等之后的 plugin 上线就不用了
|
4
LiuJiang 2023-04-12 09:35:01 +08:00 2
我怎么感觉不太对劲,gpt 的训练数据可是截止到 2019 年的哦
|
5
dlsflh 2023-04-12 09:36:27 +08:00 via Android
我想问一下,你在咨询它你不熟悉的领域时,你怎么分辨它是不是在瞎说?
|
8
WispZhan 2023-04-12 09:51:15 +08:00
你说的这个目前就是一个电商们新的突破口,已经有线上零售渠道这么开始干了。一些咨询公司也有对应业务了。
|
9
PerFectTime 2023-04-12 11:25:16 +08:00 4
|
10
Dragonphy 2023-04-12 11:59:22 +08:00
别把胡诌当真
|
11
yoyolichen 2023-04-12 12:02:03 +08:00
去 dy 搜搜当 gpt 遇上 lol 时,基本满嘴跑火车
|
12
Kaisar 2023-04-12 12:04:30 +08:00
@PerFectTime 一本正经的胡说八道我只服 GPT
|
13
sakujo 2023-04-12 12:07:02 +08:00
GPT 满嘴跑火车,别当真
|
14
darkengine 2023-04-12 12:10:09 +08:00
@PerFectTime 这个我试过,问它一个库的用法,它给我发了个 0.3.x 的使用方法,然后那个库已经到 2.x.x 了 😂
|
15
RageBubble 2023-04-12 12:19:39 +08:00
我不知道你说的是 3.5 还是 4 ,反正 GPT4 胡说的机率下降了很多,而且 GPT4 写代码的能力是绝无仅有的,其他的 AI 一个能打的都没有。
|
16
hertzry 2023-04-12 12:23:05 +08:00
@RageBubble GitHub Copilot 呢?
|
17
RageBubble 2023-04-12 14:28:53 +08:00
@hertzry 我不是专门的程序员所以 copilot 用的少,copilot 也是用的 opena 公司另一个专门补全代码的模型,应该差不多吧。gpt4 主要可以来回提问和修改,copliot 现在就是在 IDE 里补全代码。
|
18
wanguorui123 2023-04-12 14:36:18 +08:00
Chatgpt 只是信息整合能力很强,还是缺乏判断力和全文逻辑能力,回答的结果也仅供参考
|
20
tangseng233 2023-04-12 16:25:23 +08:00
|
21
ysn2233 2023-04-12 16:30:23 +08:00
2 年前的数据库对买东西真的有用么
|
22
coyoteer 2023-04-12 16:46:33 +08:00
@PerFectTime 真正用过 chatgpt 搞开发的才知道,生成代码 so easy ,运行代码 so hard
|
23
euph 2023-04-12 17:11:47 +08:00 via Android
我问他 kpw5 屏幕几寸的,他会一本正经的说 6 寸,其实是 6.8 寸的。
|
24
zoffy 2023-04-12 17:40:14 +08:00 1
ChatGPT 写代码不太行,但 Review 代码是宗师级别的
|
26
wovfeng 2023-04-12 17:57:20 +08:00 via iPhone
我已经用它做了一个完整的蜘蛛纸牌手机版了。非常好用。
|
27
smallyu 2023-04-12 18:21:51 +08:00
我试了,可以帮忙分析日志
|
28
siknet 2023-04-12 20:21:24 +08:00 via Android
你问问它金庸十大门派有哪些
|
29
lovelylain 2023-04-12 21:08:59 +08:00 via Android
chatgpt 有个问题是无论答案是否靠谱准确,它都能自信满满作答,信任它有可能得到错误答案,不信它得花时间校对答案,有点鸡肋呢。
|
30
registerrr 2023-04-12 21:25:35 +08:00
要准确还是得用 new bing
|
31
registerrr 2023-04-12 21:27:00 +08:00
@registerrr #30 用 new bing 的精确模式, 基本上一些简单的问题还是不错的
|
32
erikk0 2023-04-13 01:56:47 +08:00
大多数情况下我感觉还是 work 的,我基本上也只拿他来写一些很简单但是麻烦的代码,但是逻辑复杂度一上来就不太行了,包括比较新的技术或者依赖都不是很熟悉。
|
33
yinsane OP 不吹不黑,买雪鞋,gpt 真没乱说。
发不了图,我直接复制粘贴: Tecnica Mach Sport HV 100 Ski Boots vs Nordica Cruise 120 Ski Boots vs HEAD EDGE LYT 80 SKI BOOTS, which one is better for wide feet? When it comes to ski boots for wide feet, it's essential to consider the boot's last width, which refers to the width of the forefoot area. Wider lasts generally provide a better fit for people with wider feet. Here's a quick comparison of the three ski boots you mentioned: Tecnica Mach Sport HV 100 Ski Boots: This boot features a last width of 103 mm, which falls into the category of high-volume or wider fit. It offers good comfort and performance for skiers with wide feet. Nordica Cruise 120 Ski Boots: These boots have a 104 mm last width, making them suitable for wide feet as well. They provide a comfortable fit and decent performance for intermediate to advanced skiers. HEAD Edge LYT 80 Ski Boots: The last width of these boots is 102 mm, which is also considered to be on the wider side. They offer a comfortable fit and are designed for beginner to intermediate skiers. Based on the last width, all three ski boots can accommodate wide feet. However, the Nordica Cruise 120 Ski Boots have the widest last width at 104 mm, potentially making them the best option for individuals with wide feet. Keep in mind that personal preference, skill level, and intended use also play a significant role in choosing the right ski boot. It's always best to try on multiple ski boots and consult with a boot fitter to find the perfect fit for your individual needs. |