sanic 自家的 hello world 评测性能也不是很牛逼。

采用了的 https://github.com/channelcat/sanic/tree/master/tests/performance 里面的代码. 我就测试了 bottle 和 sanic. bottle 的按照他自己代码

# Run with: gunicorn --workers=1 --worker-class=meinheld.gmeinheld.MeinheldWorker -b :8000 simple_server:app
import bottle
from bottle import route, run
import ujson


@route('/')
def index():
    return ujson.dumps({'test': True})

app = bottle.default_app()

sanic 的代码如下

import sys
import os
import inspect

currentdir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(inspect.getfile(inspect.currentframe())))
sys.path.insert(0, currentdir + '/../../../')

from sanic import Sanic
from sanic.response import json

app = Sanic("test")


@app.route("/")
async def test(request):
    return json({"test": True})

if __name__ == '__main__':
    app.run(host="0.0.0.0", port=sys.argv[1])

ab 都是 ab -n 10000 -c 10 http://192.168.2.110/
结果如下 bottle

HTML transferred:       130000 bytes
Requests per second:    1677.17 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       5.962 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       0.596 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          281.71 [Kbytes/sec] received

sanic 如下

HTML transferred:       130000 bytes
Requests per second:    526.89 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       18.979 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       1.898 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          53.00 [Kbytes/sec] received

为什么呢？说好牛逼的 uvloop 和 httptools 呢？难道只有在数据库操作这些东西的时候，才会表现出异步的优势？